SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(MP) 92

J.S.VERMA, B.M.LAL
BHERUSINGH VALA BAMNIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH BHOPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.Sethi, S.L.SAXENA,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) B. M. LAL J. :- The Order passed in this Petition shall also govern the disposal of the Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 966 of 85 (Miss Sarita v. State and others), No. 967/85 (Deo Karan v. State and Others), No. 969/85 (Miss Rahman v. State of M. P. and others), No. 971/85 (Shyam Singh v. State of M. P. and others,) No. 972/85 (Prakash Chandra V. State of M. P. and others), No. 973/85 Rameshwar v. State of M. P. and others), No. 974/85 (Shankar Singh v. State of M. P. and others), No. 968/85 (Smt. Mangla v. State of M. P. and Others), No. 970/85 (Badrilal V. State of M. P. and others), No. 976/85 (Govind v. State of M. P. and others), No. 977/85 (Smt. Triveni v. State of M. P. ,and others), No. 978/85 (Brijraj v. State of M. P. and others), No. 979/85 (Ganpat Singh V. State of M. P. and others), No. 980/85 (Asfaan Mohd. Khan v. State of m. P. and others), No. 1084/85 (Miss Sangita v. State of M. P.), No. 1085/85 (Jeewan prasad v. State of M. P. and others), No. 1086/85 (Dilawar Khan v. State of M. P. and others), No. 1087/85 (Vikral Singh v. State of M. P. and others), No. 1088/85 (Jagdish chandra v. State of M. P. and others), No. 1089/85 (Mahipal Singh v. State of






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top