SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(MP) 36

S.K.DUBEY
MAHENDRAKUMAR GANPATJI PAGARE – Appellant
Versus
ANAND RAMCHANDRA CHANDORKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.B.Joshi, V.M.REGE,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE petitioner-landlord has filed this revision under Section 23-E of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short the Act), against the order dated 4-8-1987 of the Rent Controlling Authority, Indore (for short the authority) in case No. 90/7/19/85-86.

( 2. ) BRIEF facts leading to this petition are that the petitioner being a retired government servant filed an application under Section 23-A (a) of the Act claiming eviction of the respondent-tenant from the accommodation let for residential purpose on the ground that the same is required bona fide for occupation as residence for himself and for the members of his family. It was also pleaded that one portion of the said house is inadequate and insufficient and there is no other reasonably suitable residential accommodation of his own in his occupation in the city of Indore.

( 3. ) THE respondent filed the written statement and contended that the petitioner is not entitled to invoke the special provisions of eviction of tenants on the ground of bona fide requirement as contained in Chapter III-A of the Act. Though the petitioner is a retired Government servant and falls within the definition of landlord under













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top