SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(MP) 204

K.L.SHRIVASTAVA
Jagdish Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Sumitrabai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L. and A.K. Sethi for applicant
N.K. Patni for non-applicants.

ORDER

K.L. Shrivastava, J.-

l. This order shall also govern the disposal of Civil Revision No 202 of 1985 (Om Prakash v Smt. Padmavati and others). These revisions involve a common question.

2. These revision petitions under section 23-E of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short 'the Principal Act' or 'the Act') are directed against the orders passed by the Rent Controlling Authority Indore in Cases Nos. 654/84 (Sumitrabai and two others v. Jagdish Prasad) and 279/83 (Smt Padmavati and another v. Omprakash) holding that the cases are not liable to be transferred to the Civil Court under section 9 of the M.P. Accommodation Control (Amendment) Act 1985 (for short 'the amending Act 1985').

3. Facts giving rise to these petitions are these. In contesting the applications under the special provisions under section 23 A occurring in Chapter III-A of the Principal Act which was added by the M.P. Accommodation Control (Amendment) Act 1983 (for short the Amending Act of 1983) providing for recovery of accommodation by landlords on the ground of bona fide requirement in new forum of the Rent Controlling Authority and by summary inquiry with only a right of revision, it wa
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top