SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(MP) 8

S.M.N.RAINA
RAMSHARANDAS MOTIRAM – Appellant
Versus
MOTILAL GOPIKISAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.Pandey, S.P.Hakim,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS is a revision petition under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

( 2. ) THE plaintiff non-applicant filed a suit against the applicants for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,789-00. The suit was resisted by the applicants and preliminary issues regarding jurisdiction and maintainability of the suit etc. were framed on 6-1-1970. Subsequently on an application dated 10-8-1972 filed by the plaintiff-non-applicant the trial Court directed that issue No. 1 alone will be tried as preliminary issue while the rest of the issues will be tried and decided along with the other issues vide order dated 30-9-1972. Being aggrieved thereby the applicants have filed this revision-petition.

( 3. ) RULE 2 of Order 14 lays down that if the Court is of the opinion that the case or any part thereof may be disposed of on the issues of law only, it shall try those issues first, and for that purpose may, if it thinks fit, postpone the settlement of the issues of fact until after the issues of law have been determined. It is, therefore, clear that only question of law can be tried as preliminary issue. In S. S. Khanna v Brig. F. J. Dillon, AIR 1964 SC 497. their Lordships observed a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top