SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(MP) 95

A.P.SEN
GHANSHTAM HAZARIMAL – Appellant
Versus
NATHMAL LAXMINARAYAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.ISSRANI, R.D.Hundikar,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS order will also dispose of Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 223 of 1974 Ghanshyam and another v. Nathmal.

( 2. ) THIS further appeal in execution, filed by the judgment-debtors, defendants, is directed against an order of the Additional Judge to the District Judge, bhopal, affirming that of the 4th Civil Judge, Class II, Bhopal, rejecting their application under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure to the executability of the decree. The connected application under section 152 of the Code of civil Procedure has been filed by them for amending the decree in Second appeal No. 119 of 1972 (Hazarimal and another v. Nathmal), decided on 4-9-1972.

( 3. ) THE facts, in brief, are these: The plaintiffs suit for ejectment under section 12 (1) (h) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 was decreed by the 3rd Civil Judge, Class II, Bhopal, but the learned trial Judge, while decreeing the suit, failed to ascertain under section 18 (1) of the Act from the defendants whether they wanted to exercise their option of re-entry upon re-construction of the demised premises. That was, however, set right in appeal by the 3rd Additional District Judge, Bhopal, who dire



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top