High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
T.P. Naik and B.K. Chaturvedi, JJ.
State
Versus
Chhotelal Gangadin Gadariya
Criminal Ref. 26 of 1957 Of
Decided On : Nov 20,1957
CRIMINAL LAW - INSANITY - BURDEN OF PROOF - SECTION 84 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE - TEST FOR DETERMINING THE QUESTION OF EXEMPTION FROM LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY ON THE GROUND OF INSANITY - PREVIOUS HISTORY OF THE ACCUSED, NATURE AND CHARACTER OF THE CRIME, CONDUCT SUBSEQUENT TO THE CRIME, AND CONDUCT DURING AND AFTER THE TRIAL - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION.
Fact of the Case:
The accused, Chhotelal, was convicted of murdering his wife and child. The case was referred to the High Court for confirmation of the death sentence under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge at the commencement of the Sessions Trial. The prosecution presented evidence of the brutal nature of the attack, with multiple incised injuries on both the wife and child.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accused was of unsound mind within the meaning of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code at the time of the commission of the offense and was therefore exempt from criminal responsibility.
Issues: 1. Whether the accused was insane at the time of the commission of the offense, so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code? 2. Whether the prosecution had discharged the burden of proving that the accused was sane at the time of the offense?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the accused had discharged the burden of proving that he was insane at the time of the offense by establishing that he was incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that he was doing what was either wrong or contrary to law. 2. The court found that the accused had a history of mental illness, that the crime was committed without apparent motive or premeditation, that the accused showed no consciousness of guilt or remorse after the crime, and that his conduct during the trial was abnormal. 3. The court concluded that the accused's mental condition at the time of the offense was such that he could not be held criminally responsible for his actions.
Final Decision: The court set aside the accused's conviction and sentence of death and directed the Sessions Judge to take action under Section 471 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to order the detention of the accused in safe custody.
( 1. ) THE non-applicant accused Chhotelal was convicted of murder of his wife and child by the Sessions Judge, Nimar, and sentenced to death. The case has been referred to us for confirmation of that sentence under Section 374 of the Code of criminal Procedure. The accused has declined to appeal.
( 2. ) THE learned counsel for the accused Chhotelal did not dispute the factual responsibility of the accused for the homicide of his wife Mst. Pyaribai and his daughter Narbadi, committed on the night of 9-12-1956 at mauza Sirra. Indeed, the evidence on the point is overwhelming and the accused himself admitted it, by pleading guilty to the charge at the commencement of the Sessions Trial. The only point pressed before us that in the circumstances proved, the plea of insanity raised by the counsel for the accused in the Court of Session had been established.
( 3. ) THE facts of the case shortly stated are as follows: The accused was a workman in the railway gang No. 98 working at mauza Sirra. He lived in one of the railway quarters along with his wife and child. These quarters are near Sirra railway crossing. Sunday, the 9th December, was his weekly day off and therefore he had not gone for work that day. He was due to join duty on the 10th morning but he did not go to work that morning. Paridin (P. W. 7) is the mate of the gang. He was sitting in the railway crossing chauki at noon of the 10th when the accused passed by. He was coming from the side of the Sirra railway Station. According to Paridin (P. W. 7),
"i asked him whether she was suffering from fever. He replied, no 1 hacked (her). Then I looked at his clothes and saw that blood had stuck to them. " Paridin informed the Patel Shamlal (P. W. 1) who also questioned him (the accused) when the accused again confessed to have cut his wife and daughter with an axe. The accused then went towards his quarters.
( 4. ) SHAMLAL (P. W. 1) and Paridin (P. W. 7), accompanied with several others, then went to his quarters. The doors were open and on being called, the accused replied, sir, I am taking meals, I am comings. Immediately thereafter, he came out with a lota. On going inside, the witnesses saw the dead bodies lying on a cot covered with a quilt. The matter was reported to the police. The police came in the afternoon and went to his quarters. His blood-stained clothes, which he was still wearing, were seized. He also produced a blood-stained axe (Article A ). The Serologist confirmed the presence of human blood, both on his clothes as well as on the axe (Article A ). The dead body of Mst. Pyaribai was lying supine on her right side, the right hand supporting the head for a pillow, and the child was lying supine on her left side in the posture of suckling the milk from the breast of her mother. There were six incised injuries on the person of Mst. Narbadi.
( 5. ) THE brutal character of the attack can be gathered from the nature and the location of the injuries which were as follows: Injuries on the person of Mst. Pyaribai, vide Exh. P. 1:
1. Incised transverse injury: -- on the upper part of the left clavicle 3"x 1/2"x21/2" maximum depth lateral-wards. 2. Incised transverse injury 1/2" above injury No. 1, 2"x 1/2x2 1/2" joining injury No. 1 in its depth lateralwards. On further examination it was found that the jugular vein was cut as also in soft parts below. 3. Incised transverse injury on left side of the face starting from in lower end of the nose and extending lateral wards 4 1/2 x 1/2" laterally, lateral half, bone-deep and medial half, joining in cavity of the mouth below. 4. Incised oblique injury starting from the lateral left junction of the two lips 4" x1" bone deep, fractured upper end of the left mandible which is seen exposed, joining the cavity of the mouth. 5. Incised oblique injury, 5"x2" extending from the mid and anterior part of the body of the mandible and going downwards and lateralwards, in medial part is bone deep and the lateral part is muscle deep.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.