SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 109

Y.B.SURYAVANSHI, A.QURESHI
Ishwarlal Vyas – Appellant
Versus
District Judge – Respondent


ORDER

Y.B. Suryavanshi, J.

1. This is a petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 7-5-1987, and even earlier orders passed by the respondent No. 1, District and Sessions Judge, Indore, asking the petitioner to vacate the Gumti, premises previously allotted to the petitioner's father, an erstwhile Notary, late Shri Bhanwarial Vyas. The petitioner has also prayed that the premises, which are now in occupation of respondent No. 2, G. N. Vyas, Advocate/Notary be allotted to the petitioner and the possession status quo ante be restored."

2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner's father, (late) Shri Bhanwarlal Vyas was allotted a licence for land measuring 8' X10' in the District Court compound at Indore, vide allotment order dated 5-1-1979, passed by then District Judge. It was further stated in the allotment order that the allottee could construct a hutment for gumti temporarily for the use at a rate fixed by the P.W.D., which shall be regularly paid by the allottee. It was also stated that the extension work in the Court premises is in progress, and if required, those premises, which have been given "temporarily" and "till further orders













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top