SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 403

R.C.LAHOTI
Sushila Bai W/O Ram Nihore Patel – Appellant
Versus
Ram Nihore Jagatdhari Prasad – Respondent


ORDER

R.C. Lahoti, J.

1. The wife appellant has come up in appeal aggrieved by an order dated 4-11-1988 passed by the District Judge, Morena, rejecting her application Under Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code seeking setting aside of an ex parte decree of divorce dated 19-1-1988 passed in C.O.S. No. 17- A/87 by the District Judge, Morena in favour of the husband/respondent.

2. The application Under Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code was filed on 28-3-1988 alleging that process server had come to her on 3-10-1987 but she told him to come on the following day because she wanted to consult her husband before accepting the summons. At that time the couple was living together. In the evening when the husband returned from the office, he told the wife that the proceedings were initiated by him in a fit of anger and the appellant need not bother nor attend the Court because he would have the proceedings terminated which would otherwise gathered the knowledge of the ex parte decree on 17-3-1988 when the husband/respondent told her that the marriage between them had been dissolved by a decree of divorce.

3. The husband/respondent contested the prayer by denying all the averments made in















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top