SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 586

S.P.SRIVASTAVA
Neeti Bhan – Appellant
Versus
Miss Hill Education Society – Respondent


ORDER

S.P. Srivastava, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Management of the 'Miss Hill School' terminating her service, the petitioner who had been employed in that 'school' as an Assistant Teacher has now approached this Court seeking redress praying for the quashing of the order and for her reinstatement in service with full back wages.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents.

3. In this case the respondent society running and managing the school as well as the Principal of the School and the State of Madhya Pradesh, who have been arrayed as respondents, have filed separate counter-affidavits/returns in opposition to the writ petition.

4. The facts in brief, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this case lie in a narrow compass. The petitioner is a graduate from Jaipur University. Applications had been invited by the Management running and managing the school from eligible lady candidates having at least five years experience of serving Nursery schools of repute for appointment as a teacher. The petitioner was selected and granted an appointment in the time scale of pay of Rs. 545-10-575-






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top