SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 429

I.S.SHRIVASTAVA
Devendra @ Golu – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Yogesh Gupta for applicant;
G.S. Chouhan, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The applicant has filed the copy of the proceedings of the Juvenile Court, Indore along with the statement of the witnesses Ravi (PW-1) to Nagesh (PW-4). It has been prayed by the counsel for the applicant that there is no need to call for the record as he has filed the copy of the relevant proceedings, statements and the challian.

2. Final arguments heard.

3. Applicant Devendra @ Golu is being tried with respect to Crime No. 455 of Police Station Pardeshipura, Indore and chllan has been filed under section 302, 327, 323,147,148 & 149 of the IPC against him. The applicant is juvenile. The prosecution witnesses Ravi (PW-1), Hemraj @ Pappi (PW2). Dev karan (PW-3) and Nagesh (PW-4) have not supported the prosecution case. Trial will take time. The applicant is juvenile. The bail has been refused by the trial Court and by the First Appellate Court vide order dated 8.3.2011 by the Court of Shri Satyendra Joshi, 18th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore. The applicant is juvenile. In the company of other criminals there will be an adverse effect on the character and mentality of the applicant, hence the revision should be allowed.

4. Counsel for the respondent has opposed the revision



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top