SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 1118

RAKESH SAKSENA
Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S. Ahluwalia for applicant; P.C. Jain, Panel Lawyer for State.

ORDER

1. Applicant has filed this revision under section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, against the order dated 17.10.2007, passed by Sixth Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar, in Criminal Appeal No. 421/07, affirming the order dated 12.10.2007, passed by Chief Judical Magistrate, Sagar, rejecting the bail application of applicant in connection with Crime No. 161/07, registered by Police Khimlasa of District Sagar, under sections 452,354,506 and 376 of Indian Penal Code.

2. According to prosecution, on 14.6.2007 at about 3 O'clock in the day, applicant went at the house of prosecutrix and on the pretext of demanding screw driver entered her house and committed rape on her., When prosecutrix shouted, other family members reached at the spot, then accused ran away. Report of the incident was lodged by the prosecutrix on 21.6.2007, wherein it was mentioned that as soon as accused caught hold of her and gaged her mouth, she shouted and accused ran away. In the statement of prosecutrix recorded on 21.6.2007 and in the statement recorded on 27.6.2007 under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it was disclosed that applicant had committed sexu










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top