V.K.AGRAWAL
Tej Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
V.K. Agrawal, J.
1. The accused/Appellants stand convicted Under Section 376 (2) (g) & 506-Part-II of the I.P.C. and each of them have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- Under Section 376 (2) (g) I.P.C., while each of them have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 2 years Under Section 506 Part-II of the I.P.C. by judgment dated 13.8.1997 in S.T. No. 119/1996 by I Additional Sessions Judge, Balaghat.
2. Cr. Appeal No. 2063/1997 has been filed on behalf of accused/ Appellants Tejram, Khunnu @ Sudhram and Aghan. However, the accused/Appellant Khunnu @ Sudhram has also filed Cr. Appeal No. 2064/1997, while the accused/Appellant Aghan has filed Cr. Appeal No. 2065 of 1997 from jail.
3. Since ail the appeals relate to the same judgment, they are being disposed of together by this common judgment.
4. The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 28.9.1995, prosecutrix Sushilabai (P.W.5) along with her friends Hemlata (P.W.6) and Subhadra (P.W.7) had gone to the school at Paraswada. After the school was over at about 4.00 P.M., they were returning back to their home at village Salhe from the thoroughfare going through the jungle. When they reach
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.