SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(MP) 238

T.N.SINGH
Shamsher Khan – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Electricity Board – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ku. Vidya Tambat for appellants
S.K. Dube for respondents

ORDER

Dr. T.N. Singh, J.-1. What minimum price human life should fetch in today's money-market in this country?

2. In the context of jurisprudence of compensation for motor accidents, Krishna Iyer, J., speaking for the Court in Concord of India Insurance Co. AIR 1979 SC 1666, expressed vocally judicial concern for denial of social justice to the citizens of this country, hoping perhaps that no more they would be weighed like slaves. Thus he spoke: "................determination of the question must be liberal, not niggardly since law values life and limbs in this free country in generous scales".

3. I think, Legislature has responded for the judicial concern adequately, enacting section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, for short, the 'Act'. When any human-being perishes in a motor accident, DO matter how old he was, or what his station in life was, his legal representatives are to be paid atonce a sum of Rs.15,000/- and not a paisa less than that. I quote relevant portion of section 92-A :

"92-A. Liability to pay compensation in certain cases on the principle of no fault-(1)

(2) The amount of compensation which shall be payable under sub-section (1) in respect of death of any pers
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top