SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(MP) 315

SHEEL NAGU
Nathu Lal – Appellant
Versus
Babulal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant:Shri S.S. Rajput, Advocate.
For Respondents:Shri Rishikesh Bohre, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. This Second appeal under Section 100 of CPC assails the concurrent findings of two courts below whereby the suit filed for declaratory decree of title and permanent injunction in respect of suit property against the defendants has been rejected.

2. The arguments of learned counsel for the rival parties are heard on the question of admission and the record of both the courts below is perused.

3. The plaintiff claimed the declaratory decree of title and permanent injunction on the basis of adverse possession of the suit land since 1957 when the plaintiff claimed that his father purchased the suit land for a consideration of Rs. 350/in regard of which no registered document is available except for receipt of the said consideration and a deed of conveyance recorded on a plain paper which is not registered . The trial court found that besides the above said unregistered document certain applications were produced by the plaintiff in respect of his claim which had been filed before the Collector Guna. The plaintiff also claimed title on the basis of adverse possession but did not produce any revenue record in support of his continuous uninterrupted possession of the suit land.









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top