Sujoy Paul
Mukesh Singh Chaturvedi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Petitioners have filed this petition challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the orders Annexure P-1 dated 7.6.2004, (Annexure P-14) dated 4.6.2004 and Annexure R-1 dated 26.8.2005.
Brief facts necessary for lawful adjudication of this matter are as under:-
2. The case of the petitioners is that they purchased the land in question pursuant to the sale deeds Annexure P-2 and P-3. After the said sale deeds, a mutation was done by order dated 9.10.2002 (Annexure P-9). The demarcation was made by way of Panchanama Annexure P-7. Thereafter, the petitioner prayed for change of land use and accordingly permission for diversion was sought for. On 6.5.2003 (Annexure P-5) no objection was given by the Nazul Officer, Gwalior. The NOC was given by Traffic Police by Annexure P-6 and by PHE Vide Annexure P-11. The State Government, in turn, published a notification in the Official Gazette dated 1.8.2003 and by way of this notification dated 23.7.2003 permission for diversion was given. By order dated 11.12.2003 (Annexure P-12), Town and Country Planning granted NOC. The Municipal Corporation granted NOC by order dated 24.2.2004 (Annexure P-13).
3. Shri Anil Sharma, learned coun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.