SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 240

N.K.Gupta
Wear Well Tyre and Tubes – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Atulanand Awasthy for applicants; S.K. Menon for respondent.

ORDER

1. The applicants have preferred the present revision against the order dated 29.12.2010 passed by the Ist Additional Judge to the Court of Vth Additional Session Judge, Chhindwara in Criminal Revision No.36/2009 whereby the impugned order dated 21.1.2009 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhindwara in Criminal Case No.3509/1997 was set aside and the application filed under sections 65, 74, 78 and 79 of the Evidence Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) was allowed.

2. The facts of the case in short are that a prosecution was launched before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Indore in 1996 that the applicants did not pay the Excise duty of Rs.4,78,000/- and therefore, they were prosecuted under section 9 of the Central Excise Act. Thereafter, the case was transferred to the Court of CJM, Chhindwara according to its territorial jurisdiction. When the evidence of the complainant was started an application was moved by the prosecution under sections 65, 74, 78 and 79 of the Evidence Act read with section 35A of the Act.

3. The trial Court after considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties dismissed the application and thereafter, a revisi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top