SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(MP) 59

P.K.TARE
Shrikrishnadas – Appellant
Versus
Radhabai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Applicants: J.V. Jakatdar.
For Non-Applicant: Kumar Rama Gupta.

ORDER

P.K. TARE, J.

1. This is a revision by the plaintiff landlord against the order, dated 20.9.1965, passed by the II Civil Judge, Class II Burhanpur, in Civil Suit No. 79-A of 1964, directing the petitioner landlord to place the respondent tenant in possession of an open plot of land purporting to act under section 151 read with section 18 (3) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961.

2. The petitioner filed a suit for eviction of the tenant on the ground that the building was required to be reconstructed and that it was in a dilapidated condition. That suit was compromised on 5.1.1965, whereby the parties agreed that the tenant would vacate the premises on 6.2.1965 and the landlord would complete reconstruction of the building within four months of that date. The construction was, however, not completed within four months and the trial Court further granted an extension of time by another four months. As such, the petitioner was expected to complete the reconstruction of the building by 6.10.1965. On the landlord's failure to complete the reconstruction by 6.10.1965, the tenant applied for taking action against the landlord under section 18 (3) of the M.P. Accommodation Contro


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top