S.R.ALAM, ALOK ARADHE
Ajay Dubey – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.R. Alam, J.In these three writ petitions since common question of law and facts are involved and also as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, they were heard together and are being decided by this common order.
2. Writ Petition No. 1574/2008 and Writ Petition No. 13329/2009 have been preferred as public interest litigations by one Ajay Dubey describing himself to be Secretary of Environment Friendly Organization- 'Prayatna', mainly with the grievance that number of mines/quarries are being operated illegally across the State of Madhya Pradesh without obtaining the statutory clearances which are mandatory in nature and, therefore, a direction has been sought to stop operation of all such mines which are being run notwithstanding the fact that closure orders have already been issued by the concerned authorities. It has also been inter alia prayed that a High Level Committee be constituted to enquire the matter pertaining to grant of permission for such mining operations.
3. In the other petition i.e. W. P. No. 13329/2009, the validity of sub-rules (1) and (2) of Rule 49 of M. P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 1996 Rules') which gives
S. Jagannath Vs. Union of India and others
M. C. Mehta Vs. Union of India, (2004) 12 SCC 118 (Paras 13
M. Vs. Krishnan Nambissan Vs. State of Kerala
Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. Food Inspector and another
M. C. Mehta Vs. Union of India
KSL and Industries Ltd. Vs. Arihant Threads Ltd.
Venkateshwar Rao Vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh
State of Bihar Vs. Yogendra Singh
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.