SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(MP) 920

RAKESH SAKSENA, T.K.KAUSHAL
In Reference (Received from III ASJ (Fast Track Court) – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Rajak – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
In Cri. Ref. No. 2/2011 :
Mr. Umesh Pandey, Govt. Advocate for the State
Mr. Surendra Singh, Sr. Advocate , Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dubey, Advocate with him for the Complainant
Mr. S.C. Datt, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Siddharth Datt, Mr. R.S. Patel , Mr. Alok Vagrecha, Advocates with him for the Respondents/Accused.
In Cri. A. No. 1780/2011 :
Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate for the Appellant
Mr. Umesh Pandey, Govt. Advocate for the State/Respondent
Mr. Surendra Singh, Sr. Advocate , Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dubey, Advocate with him for the Complainant.
In Cri.A. No. 1793/2011 :
Mr. S.C. Datt, Sr. Advocate , Mr. Siddharth Datt, Advocate with him for the Appellant
Mr. Umesh Pandey, Govt. Advocate for the State/Respondent
Mr. Surendra Singh, Sr. Advocate , Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dubey,
Advocate with him for the Complainant.
In Cri.A. No. 1818/2011 :
Mr. Alok Vagrecha, Advocate for the Appellant
Mr. Umesh Pandey, Govt. Advocate for the State/Respondent
Mr. Surendra Singh, Sr. Advocate , Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dubey, Advocate with him for the Complainant.

Judgment

Rakesh Saksena, J.:-

Aforesaid criminal reference and appeals arise out of the common impugned judgment, therefore, this judgment shall govern the disposal of all the above cases.

1. Appellants have filed appeals against the judgment dated 30th July 2011, passed by III Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Narsinghpur, in Sessions Trial No. 214/2009, convicting them under Sections 364-A/34, 302/34 and 302/120-B, 201 and 404/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing them to death with fine of Rs. 100/-, Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years with fine of Rs. 1000/- and Rigorous Imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs. 100/-, on each count respectively. In default of payment of fine, appellants have further been sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for one month, on each count respectively.

2. Learned Trial Judge has since awarded death sentence to all the appellants, he has made reference to this Court for confirmation of the same.

3. In short, the prosecution case is that on 6-5-2009, at about 10.30 a.m., Smt. Nidhi Thakur made a telephonic report to Police Station, Narsinghpur that her brother Pankaj had gone to Jabalpur in the morning of 5-5-2009 for getting his Wa














































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top