The petitioner has approached this Court ventilating his grievance against the action of respondent No. 1 of not recording the correct date of birth of the petitioner in his service roll and making the petitioner to retire on the basis of wrong date of birth recorded in the service record of the petitioner. It is contended that the original mark-sheet produced by the petitioner specifically contains the right date of birth of the petitioner to be 11-4-1956. Such a document was made available at the initial time of recruitment. This fact is clear from the endorsement made on the document itself by the Employment Exchange and, therefore, it was necessary for the respondent No. 1 to act on the representation of the petitioner and to direct correction in the date of birth of the petitioner. It was found by the petitioner when a Pan Card was issued to the petitioner that his wrong date of birth was recorded in the service record and that being so, the representation was made by the petitioner. It was specifically pointed out by the petitioner that there is some sort of manipulation done in the service record of the petitioner and, therefore, the correction of the date of birth