SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 1420

ALOK ARADHE
Uttam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Avinash Zargar, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Vijay Soni, Panel Lawyer

JUDGMENT

Heard on the question of admission.

2. This appeal is by the plaintiff, who has lost in both the Courts.

3. Facts giving rise to filing of the appeal briefly stated are that the plaintiff filed the suit seeking the relief of declaration of title and permanent injunction. The claim in the suit was based on the ground that the plaintiff is the owner and is in possession of a plot admeasuring 30 x 40 square feet. It was further pleaded that the plaintiff is in continuous possession of the aforesaid plot since 1984-85 and was also granted lease of the said plot in the year 1992. However, the respondents passed an order of eviction of the plaintiff. In the aforesaid circumstances, the plaintiff filed the suit seeking the relief as aforesaid.

4. The defendants filed the written statement and contested the claim of the plaintiff. It was denied that the plaintiff was granted any lease in respect of the land in question. It was further stated that the plaintiff is an encroacher in respect of the plot in question.

5. The Trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 7-10-2011 dismissed the suit on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to adduce evidence. The aforesaid decree was affirme






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top