SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 1051

K.K.TRIVEDI
Aditya Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Anshuman Singh
For the Respondents: Mahendra Pateriya

JUDGMENT

K.K. Trivedi, J.:-

The petitioner has claimed interest on his retiral dues, which according to the petitioner, were illegally withheld by the respondents on false pretext that the petitioner was facing an investigation for economic offence and, therefore, was not liable to be paid the retiral dues, though the petitioner had attained the age of superannuation and has retired on 31-1-2010. It is contended by the petitioner that while working on the post of Superintending Engineer in the establishment of respondents No. 1 and 2, he stood superannuated on 31-1-2010. All pensionary claims, retiral dues of the petitioner were required to be settled by the respondents expeditiously under the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules'). However, such retiral dues of the petitioner were illegally withheld without any justified reason. In fact the respondent No. 3 was harbouring personal animosity against the petitioner and he being the nodal officer to process the retiral claim of the petitioner, made every efforts to ensure that the petitioner is denied his retiral dues. There was nothing against the petitioner as a no dues






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top