SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 1161

A.K.SHRIVASTAVE
Deepak Marawi – Appellant
Versus
Kala Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Neelam Goel, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Sanjay Saini, Advocate

JUDGMENT

A.K. Shrivastave, J.

1. This is an application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that the Complaint Case No. 1969/2008 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mandla filed by respondent/complainant, which has been registered under Section 494 of IPC, be quashed. The respondent filed a complaint case and after recording her testimony under Section 200 and the witnesses under Section 202 of Cr.P.C., a case under Section 494, IPC has been registered against the applicant and notice was issued to him. Indeed, for the quashment of the registration of the case under Section 494 of IPC against the applicant this application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed.

2. The contention of Ms. Goel, learned Counsel for the applicant/husband is that the respondent/complainant herself has averred in Para 1 of the complaint that she belongs to Gond community and got married to the applicant according to the custom prevailing in the Gond community in the month of Vaisakh (corresponding month June), 1981. After the marriage two children were also born out of the wedlock of complainant and the present applicant. However, in the month of October, 1990 the applicant upon







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top