SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 1018

K.K.TRIVEDI
Mahendra Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : D.K. Dixit
For the Respondents: Amit Sharma, Panel Lawyer, Aditya Adhikari and Sanjay Singh

Judgment:

K.K. Trivedi, J.

1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought to challenge the report submitted by the respondent No. 3 for taking an action against the petitioner for recovery of the amount, said to be spent unauthorizedly for the purpose of taking certain facilities. The petitioner was appointed as Chairman of the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Beej Avam Farm Vikas Nigam (hereinafter referred to as 'Corporation') vide Notification dated 18-5-2004. According to the petitioner, he has been given the status of a Cabinet Minister by an order of the State Government issued on 5th August, 2004. According to the petitioner, he is entitled to get all the facilities which are provided to a Cabinet Minister. He was further appointed for a year as Chairman of the aforesaid Corporation vide Notification dated 10th May, 2007. The said period was extended by order dated 21st May, 2008 for a further period of two years. Certain actions were taken by the petitioner because of his strong administration against some of the erring officers. Out of prejudices and bias because of such strict action taken by the petitioner, a frivolous complaint was made





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top