M.K.MUDGAL
Tantulal Ahirwar – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Agro Sales – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.K. Mudgal, J.
1. With the consent of both the parties, the final arguments were heard at the motion stage.
2. Petitioner/accused has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 4.7.2012 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vidisha in Private Complaint No. 1694 of 2010 whereby, the application filed by the respondent/complainant for making correction in the private complaint has been allowed.
3. The facts stated in brief are that respondent/complainant was having a shop named as Shrikrishna Agro Sales in Vidisha. The petitioner used to visit the said shop. On 7th December, 2009, he came to the shop and purchased some goods worth Rs. 50,000/- on credit and thereafter he gave a cheque bearing No. 0494063 of Union Bank Branch Vidisha on 20.1.2010 for payment of Rs. 30,000/-. When, the cheque was presented before the bank, it was returned by the bank on the ground that the account has already been closed. Hence, the respondent/complainant filed a private complaint against the petitioner under Negotiable Instrument Act mentioning Cheque No. 049063. The respondent filed his affidavit and documents in support of the complaint whereupon cog
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.