SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 1255

B.D.RATHI
Toran Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Susheel Goswami, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Anil Kumar Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer.

JUDGMENT

B.D. Rathi, J.

1. This revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1974 preferred by the petitioners-accused is directed against an order dated 26/9/2012 passed in S.T. No. 3/2012 by the Additional Sessions Judge Ganjbasoda, district Vidisha, framing charge against accused/petitioners for commission of offence punishable under Section 307/149 of I.P.C.

2. The facts, in short, just for the decision of this revision are that on 7/11/2011 at around 11 o'clock, in the noon, in village Karonda at the field of Khurd Teliwala the accused-petitioners after having armed with deadly weapons like farsa, luhangi, axe rushed to the field and restrained the complainant Rajesh from ploughing and on being objected the complainant Rajesh and his father Bhawani Singh Raghuvanshi were caused grievous injuries by the accused-petitioners with their respective weapons. On report, Crime No. 227/11 was registered against the petitioners for commission of offence punishable under sections 294, 324, 451, 506/34 of I.P.C. On committal, the session trial was commenced and charges, as mentioned above, have been framed against the petitioners/accused by the learned trial Judg
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top