JUDGMENT

Sujoy Paul, J.

1. These petitions are analogously heard on the joint request of learned counsel for the parties.

Facts are taken from W.P. No. 2496/13.

The petitioners are owners of land described in the writ petition. Their grievance is that the respondent Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. (Corporation) is laying high tension electricity line through their land. At the outset, Shri T.S. Ruprah, learned senior counsel for the Corporation relied on a recent judgment of this Court passed in W.P. No. 3868/14 (Alkesh Tripathi Vs. The Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and others). On the strength of this, it is stated that this judgment squarely covers the points involved in the petitions in hand and petitions deserve to be dismissed.

2. Shri K.N. Gupta, senior counsel submits that the judgment in Alkesh Tripathi (supra) is distinguishable. By taking this Court to various paragraphs of Alkesh Tripathi (supra), it is argued that in Alkesh Tripathi (supra) and in the judgment of Indore Bench in Vijay Ramanchandra Agrawal Vs. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. (2010(4) MPLJ 73, the facts are different. To elaborate, Shri Gupta, learned senior counsel submits that in Alkesh Trip