Back
S.K.GANGELE, S.K.PALO
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ramkishan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.K. Palo, J.
1. Criminal Appeal No. 198/2001 and Criminal Appeal No. 119/2002 have arisen out of the same judgment dated 30th March, 2001 passed by the Sessions Judge, Bhind in S.T. No. 13/92, whereby the learned trial Court has convicted appellant Manoj under Section 304-B and 498-A of IPC. At the same time acquitted the accused Ramkishan and Sharda Devi on the same charges.
2. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment of conviction, appellant, Manoj has filed appeal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. assailing and requesting for setting aside the judgment. Whereas, the State of Madhya Pradesh has filed Criminal Appeal No. 119/2002 under Section 378 of Cr. P.C challenging the judgment of acquittal of respondents Ramkishan and Sharda Devi.
3. It is not disputed that Rajni Saxena was married to appellant Manoj Shrivastava in June 1987 and respondents Ramkishan and Sharda Devi are the parents of the appellant Manoj Shrivastava. It is also not disputed that the accused persons are taken into custody on 22nd September, 1997 by memo of arrest Ex. P/23.
4. The facts transpired before the learned Trial Court are that on 10.9.1991 an information was sent by the District Hospital, Bhind to the Polic
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
