Satyanarayan Mahor vs State of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 Supreme(MP) 311

ROHIT ARYA
Satyanarayan Mahor – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Jitendra Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R.P. Rathi, Government Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Rohit Arya, J.

1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenge is made to the order dated 12/11/2009 issued by the Collector-respondent no.3 terminating the contract employment of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner was offered contract employment as Sub Engineer vide order dated 24/2/2007 on conditions inter alia that the appointment is purely temporary, contract employment is for one year and in the event performance and working methodology if not found satisfactory, the employment shall be terminated. It appears that there was gross irregularities and substandard construction work of the building of Government Primary School, Heerapura, Block Vijaypur. A complaint was made in that behalf. In the enquiry, one Manoj Kumar Sharma, Construction Secretary, was found to be negligent and lacking in his official duty and, therefore, was suspended. The petitioner, Sub Engineer, was deputed for revaluation of the cost of construction and the quality of construction. As per his report, the value of the building was Rs.1,19,685/- and the construction was reported to be of superior quality and fit for use for 30 years. On enquiry being conducted by the Exec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document