SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 831

S.K.GANGELE, B.D.RATHI
Vandana Dhakad – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner None.
For the Respondents/State:Raghvendra Dixit, Government Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

B. D. Rathi :-

This petition has been preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved from the order dated 29-6-2005 Annexure P/1 passed by High Level Committee constituted by the State Government under the directions of the Supreme Court in the case of Madhuri Patil vs. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, AIR 1995 SC 94.

2. Brief facts of the case are that father of the petitioner Shri Om Prakash Dhakad was migrated from the State of Rajasthan to the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioner-Vandna Dhakad has born on 17-1-1975 in Mandsor (State of Madhya Pradesh). Her father was posted as Temporary Sub Inspector in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioner and her father belongs to "Dhanuk" caste which is declared as Scheduled Caste in the State of Madhya Pradesh as well as in the State of Rajasthan. Since the petitioner was born in the State of Madhya Pradesh and is continuously residing in the State of Madhya Pradesh since her birth. The caste certificate was issued by the competent authority as Annexure P/3 and also issued by the Sub Divisional Officer and that was cancelled by passing the impugned order Annexure P/l dated 29-6-2005














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top