S.C.SHARMA
Sona w/o Subhash Talera – Appellant
Versus
Subhash s/o Chandulal Talera – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner before this Court has filed this present writ petition being aggrieved by the order dt. 21/2/2013(Annexure P/1) passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore in Hindu Marriage Case No.652/2009.
2. Facts of the case reveal that a divorce petition has been preferred under the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955and the same is pending for adjudication before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore. During the pendency of the divorce petition, an application was preferred u/S. 24 read with Sec. 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 claiming maintenance and other reliefs and the application has been rejected by the trial Court.
3. The contention of the petitioner is that her application has been rejected on a technical ground and she has not been heard at any point of time on merits. Petitioner has further stated that she is facing a divorce petition and she is looking after two school going children. It has also been stated that her elder minor son Rishabh is studying in 12th Standard in Saint Mary Junior College, ISC Board, Pune and the petitioner has to deposit tuition fee and other fees amounting to Rs.32,000/- per month. It has also been stated
Bhanu Kumar Jain Vs. Archana Kumar and another, 2005(5) MPLJ (S. C.)3: AIR 2005 SC 626 (Paras 8
S. P. Chengalvaraya Naidu Vs. Jagannath, AIR 1994 SC 853 (Paras 8, 24
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.