M.C. Garg, J.:-

Both the writ appeals raise common question as to whether, the selection for the Aanganwadi worker can be based on geographical residence of the appellant or that only on account of the place of residence, as the appointment cannot be refused has been held by learned Single Judge vide impugned order dated 5th October, 2010 which precisely has been challenged before us by way of these writ appeals one filed by Smt. Abhilasha Sharma and other by Smt. Neelam Singh Sikarwar. For the sake of reference, we first take the writ appeal filed by Smt. Abhilasha Sharma. The facts necessary for deciding this writ narrated in para 2 of the impugned order are reproduced as under:

"The respondent No. 1 Saroj Devi/(petitioner) was appointed as Aanganwadi Worker vide order dated 30-10-2007. She was posted at Aanganwadi Center, Sakatpur. The aforesaid order was kept in abeyance vide an order dated 2-11-2007. It was mentioned in the order that due to some clerical mistake the order of appointment of the petitioner was issued. Against the aforesaid order, the petitioner filed a writ petition before this Court, which was registered as Writ Petition 5272/2007 (S). This Court vide or