SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 1477

A.M.KHANWILKAR
Digvijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :K.T.S. Tulsi, Rajendra Tiwari, Senior Advocates, Varun K. Chopra, Arpit Kumar Tiwari and Kuber Boddh, Advocate, M.K. Verma andVinod Sisodia, Advocates, Indira Jaisingh, Senior Advocate, Sumeer Sodhi, Sonakshi Malhan and Bhoopesh Tiwari, Advocate, Vivek K. Tankha, Senior Advocate,Vaibhav Shrivastava and Shekhar Sharma, Sanjay Kumar Patel, Siddharth Seth, Shailendra Kumar Pandey, Adwait Fouzdar, Advocates
For the Respondents:L. Nageshwar Rao, Senior Advocate, R.D. Jain, Advocate General, Samdarshi Tiwari, Government Advocate, Swapnil Ganguly, Deputy Government Advocate, Saurabh Mishra, Shivraj G., Abhinav Kumar Shukla and Aditya Khandekar, Advocates

Judgment

A.M. Khanwilkar, C.J.

1. This common judgment is rendered in all these matters, as similar points arise for consideration. Except the suo motu proceedings, Writ Petition No. 6385/2014, all other petitions are filed by private persons as Public Interest Litigation, inter alia, praying for a direction to withdraw the investigation of the criminal cases commonly known as PMT VYAPAM Examination Scam cases from the Special Task Force (hereinafter referred to as the "STF") constituted by the State of Madhya Pradesh; and instead entrust the same to an independent Investigating Agency, namely, Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred to as the 'CBI"). This very relief was considered by the Division Bench of this Court (one of us, namely, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Chief Justice was member of that Bench), in Writ Petition 15186/2013 (Awashesh Prasad Shukla vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others) and other companion matters, which were disposed of by a common judgment dated 16th April, 2014. In that judgment, the Division Bench rejected the prayer for transferring the investigation of subject cases to CBI, whereas it found that the investigation of those cases was entru


















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top