S.R.WAGHMARE
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State of MP – Respondent
S.R. Waghmare, J.
1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is aggrieved by order dated passed by the respondent No. 3 Upper Collector and Competent Authority, Nagar Bhumi Viniyaman (Annexure P/1) noticing the petitioner for handing over possession of the disputed land under the Urban Land Ceiling Act.
2. Briefly stated the petitioner is a citizen of Indore and resides at village Tejpur Gadbadi and is in possession of ancestral property bearing survey No. 310 and half the land of the survey ad-measuring 0.509 hectare. That the said land was agricultural land and application was filed that the land be excluded under Section 20 of the Ceiling Act. The application is Annexure P/2. A case for urban land ceiling bearing No. 384/A-90/C 1/77-78 was pending before the respondent No. 3 competent authority under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976. It was also stated that all the family members were the equal share holders in the ancestral land and the respondent No. 3 had erred in only excluding 0.150 hectare of the said land. However, Respondent No. 3 declared 0.359 hectares as surplus and demanded filing of the draft statement under Section 8(1)
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.