Vijay Singh Parihar vs State of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2011 Supreme(MP) 1152

K.K.TRIVEDI
Vijay Singh Parihar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

JUDGMENT

K.K. Trivedi, J.

1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the validity, correctness and legality of the order dated 27.4.2011 issued by the respondent No. 1 by which the petitioner is said to be transferred from Jabalpur to Satna on the post of Deputy Director, Prosecution, and in his place respondent No. 3 has been transferred from Satna to Jabalpur, on the ground that there was no such occasion to transfer the petitioner as he was posted at Jabalpur only vide order dated 28.1.2010 issued by the respondent No. 1. It is alleged that the order impugned has been issued without there being any justified reason or the administrative requirement just to accommodate the respondent No. 3. It is contended that the petitioner joined the place of posting only in the month of January, 2010 and has hardly completed his normal tenure but is sought to be transferred in such manner by the impugned order. Therefore, the order impugned is bad in law and liable to be quashed.

2. This Court considering the prayer made by the petitioner issued notices to the respondents on 29.4.2011 and from the order-sheet it appears that some sort o