SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 1057

N.K.MODY
Gayatri Devi – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Swarup alias Narayan Das Thareja – Respondent


JUDGMENT

N.K. Mody, J.

1. Being aggrieved by the award dated 31st July, 2003 passed by VII Additional MACT, Gwalior in Claim Case No. 26/2002 whereby the claim petition filed by the Appellants was dismissed, the present appeal has been filed.

2. Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the claim petition was dismissed only on the ground that in the FIR Appellants have not mentioned the vehicle number. It is submitted that Appellant No. 1 is widow, while Appellant No. 2 is minor. It is submitted that since the Appellant could not gather the documentary evidence, therefore, the same could not be filed before the learned Tribunal. It is submitted that now the documents are available with the Appellants. It is submitted that in the facts and circumstance of the case, appeal filed by the Appellants be allowed and the Appellants be permitted to file the documents.

3. Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 submits that no illegality has been committed by the learned Tribunal in dismissing the claim petition filed by the Appellants. It is submitted that the plea taken by the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 was that the Appellants are not legal representatives of deceased. It is submitted that this a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top