SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 1364

S.L.KOCHAR
Pankaj – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. V.K. Jain , Mr. Vaibhav Jain for Appellant
Mr. Hitendra Tripathi for Respondent

Judgment

S.L. Kochar, J. :

The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 378 of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 15.1.2001 rendered by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Indore in Cr. Case No. 210/99 whereby acquitting the appellant from the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, the Act).

2. The appellant/complainant filed a criminal complaint against the respondent on 17.4.1999 for commission of offence under Section 138 of the Act and under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code alleging that the respondent in a business transaction received Rs. 4,00,000/- on 1st December, 1998 from the appellant and issued post-dated cheques each of Rs. 1,00,000/- bearing Nos. 468535, 468537, 468538 and 468539 dated from 5.12.1998 to 5.3.1999, drawn on M.P. State Sahakari Bank, Indore. The respondent issued each cheque at an interval of one month and assured that on presentation in the Bank, the cheques would be honoured. The appellant presented those cheques in the Bank i.e. Bank of Rajasthan for encashment, but all the four cheques returned back from the concerned Bank with an endorsement of insufficient amount in the account on 24.3.1999.






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top