SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 584

S.C.SHARMA
Kansa – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Lokesh Kumar Bhatnagar with Rituraj Bhatnagar and
Prasanna R. Bhatnagar for petitioner.

ORDER

1. Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved in the present cases, the writ petitions were analogously heard and by a common order, they are being disposed of by this Court. Facts of Writ Petition No.2258/2015 are narrated hereunder.

2. The petitioner before this Court has filed this present writ petition being aggrieved by the order dated 9.3.2015 passed by the Project Officer, ICDS, Jhabua by which the services of the petitioner have been put to an end. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a resident of Tribal Village Aamli Phaliya, District Jhabua and she was posted at Aanganwadi Centre in the same village. She was appointed on 11.2.2008. She has undergone various trainings conducted by the Department from time to time and there was no complaint of any kind against the petitioner except the impugned termination order. The contention of the petitioner is that the her services have been put to an end by stating that she is residing at village Khagjhar and based upon the aforesaid allegation, her services have been put to an end. The petitioner has also stated that as many as 84 identically placed Aanganwadi workers who were continuing


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top