SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 580

B.D.RATHI
Manvendra Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Survesh – Respondent


Advocates:
S.S. Raghuvanshi for petitioner;
Gagan Sharma for respondents.

ORDER

1. Heard.

2. This petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred invoking inherent powers of this Court for the following relief :

“By allowing this petition, orders impugned dated 23.7.2014 and 7.3.2013 passed by the learned Courts below be set aside or opportunity may be granted to the petitioner for filing an application under section 126(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure after condoning the delay”.

3. In nutshell, facts of the case are that one application under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was preferred by the respondent-wife against the petitioner-husband for the relief of maintenance. Same was decided by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Datia, in MJC No.27/12 vide order dated 7.3.2013. The order was passed ex parte against the petitioner and the petitioner was directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,500/- per month to respondent No.1 wife and an amount of Rs.800/- per month to minor daughter. That order was challenged by way of filing criminal revision which was registered as Criminal Revision No.39/14. But the same was also dismissed vide order dated 23.7.2014. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the revisional Court,












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top