SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 592

S.R.WAGHMARE
Arpit Jain – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Sisodiya – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinay Saraf for applicant;
Nilesh Sharma for respondent.

ORDER

1. By this petition under section 482 of the CrPC the petitioner Arpit Jain has prayed for quashment of Criminal Case No.35600/2013 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent Vijay Sisodiya had filed a criminal complaint against one Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. alleging that Tata Truck bearing registration No.1109 was purchased by the respondent from Sanghi Bros. (Indore) Pvt. Ltd. The agreement of hire purchase was signed by him but since it was in English language, he could not understand the agreement. Counsel urged that he issued 48 security cheques in favour of the company, the vehicle was registered at No.MP46/G-0664. That the installment were payable two months after the purchase, however, the financial condition of the respondent Vijay Sisodia was in dire straits and he could not pay the installment on the stipulated time and on the date of the incident i.e. 23.11.2012 when the vehicle was parked in front of the residence of his brother Surendra Singh at Bicholi Mardana, Indore; one Jabbar along with 2-3 persons came there at 9 O’ Clock in the night and asked his brother to







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top