SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 600

A.M.KHANWILKAR, K.K.TRIVEDI
Kuldeep Singh Kushwah – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Manoj Sharma for petitioners;
Piyush Dharmadhikari, Government Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2;
Vivekanand Awasthy for respondent No.3.

JUDGMENT

Trivedi, J. -- 1. Three petitioners in the present writ petition have approached this Court ventilating their grievance in respect of fixation of their salary in terms of the pay revision, which has occasioned on account of adopting the Madhya Pradesh Pay Revision Rules, 2009 by the High Court. It is contended by the petitioners that they were initially appointed on their post of Registrar (I.T.) in the High Court, in the pay-scale of Rs.15100-400-18300/- on different dates. Petitioner No.1 was appointed on 23rd May, 2008 and petitioners No.2 and 3 were appointed on 10th July, 2009. The recommendations of the Pay Commission accepted by the State Government, formulated in the Madhya Pradesh Pay Revision Rules, 2009, were accepted by the High Court and in the revised pay-scale, the salary of the petitioners was required to be fixed in terms of the circular issued by the Finance Department of Government of Madhya Pradesh on 20th August, 2009. However, ignoring the table appended with the said instructions, the salary of the petitioners was fixed, which has resulted in lo




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top