SUJOY PAUL
Mescot Hospital and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the order dated 24.6.2015, whereby the registration of petitioner hospital is cancelled by respondent No.4.
2. Shri R.N. Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner hospital was registered under Madhya Pradesh Upcharyagriha Tatha Rujopchar Sambandhi Sthapanaye (Registrikaran Tatha Anugyapan) Adhiniyam, 1973 (for brevity, the 'Adhiniyam') on 16.8.2010. On 9.3.2015, one Manoj Upadhyay made a complaint (Annexure P-5) to the Collector. In turn, the Collector directed the CMHO for enquiry in relation to complaint preferred by Manoj Upadhyay. the CMHO, in turn, appointed a two-member committee comprising of Dr.Sunil Agarwal and Dr. Prabhat Kaushal. On 18.3.2015 (Annexure P-7) and 23.3.2015 (Annexure P-7), statements of Dr. Shivhare and Manoj Upadhyay were recorded by the committee. The committee submitted its report on 31.3.2015 (Annexure P-7). On 10.4.2015 (Annexure P-8), a show cause notice was issued on the basis of said enquiry report. On 15.4.2015 (Annexure P-9), the petitioner made request to respondent No.4 to supply him copy of the report. In addition, extention of time wa
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.