SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 631

SUJOY PAUL
Shyambabu Kirar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Vilas Tikhe for petitioner; Vishal Mishra, Deputy Advocate General for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution assails the order dated 16.9.2014 (Annexure P-1), order dated 27.4.2013 (Annexure P-2) and order dated 20.1.2013 (Annexure P-3).

2. Brief facts for adjudication of this matter are that the petitioner is owner of tractor No.M.P.08M 1946. On 19.7.2012, the petitioner’s tractor was seized by the Forest Department with the allegation that he was cultivating the notified and reserved forest land. The petitioner was served with a show cause notice. He denied the allegations by filing reply. Thereafter the specified authority by order dated 21.1.2013 found that the offence under section 33 (1) (c) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for brevity ‘Forest Act’) are established. The petitioner feeling aggrieved by this order, preferred an appeal which was registered as Case

No.1/2013. The appellate authority by order dated 27.4.2013 rejected this appeal. The petitioner then preferred revision which was registered as Revision No.54/2013. The Special Judge, Shivpuri rejected the said revision by order dated 16.9.2014.

3. Shri Vilas Tikhe, learned counsel for the petitioner advanced singular contention. He submits that even if it is found t

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top