SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 608

ALOK VERMA
Umesh Mandloi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Prateek Maheshwari for applicant; Amit Singh Sisodiya for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision under section 397 of CrPC is preferred against the order dated 23.5.2015 passed by learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Indore whereby, learned Additional Sessions Judge framed charges under sections 120B (1), 380 r/w 120B, 454 r/w 120B, 467 r/w 120B and 468 r/w 120B of IPC.

2. According to the prosecution story, in this case, present applicant is student of Final Year of MBBS Course in MGM Collage, Indore. He was known to another co-accused Reema Verma. Said Reema Verma was living with another student Ankita Raghuvanshi. These two girls were living in the house in two separate rooms. It is alleged that present applicant was told by Reema that she failed to qualify in three subjects and, therefore, he suggested that she should apply for revaluation of her answer books. On her request, he contacted the co-accused Nikhil Tiwari, who was working in Devi Ahilya University as daily wages employee and was posted at Central Valuation Center. He was responsible for arranging the answer book properly. It is alleged that present applicant contacted him and with his help, they brought out the answer book of Reema Verma. She changed the internal pages of the ans







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top