SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 648

M.C.GARG
Jagdish Prasad Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
D. D. Bansal for petitioner; J. M. Sahni, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision has been filed under section 397/401 of CrPC. For quashing the order dated 30.4.2015 passed by 3rd Additional Session Judge, Shivpuri in Sessions Trial No.88/2013 whereby while rejecting the prayer of discharge made by the petitioner, charge has been framed against the petitioner under sections 465, 468, 471, 167, 120B, 402 of IPC.

2. This prosecution has started on the basis of complaint made by Morarilal alleging that he was the owner of the land of which a forged 'patta' was prepared between Ram Kumar in connivance and with the help of some revenue officer and out of them, the prosecution found the present petitioner to be one of the persons responsible and have filed charge sheet against him.

3. During the course of hearing, at the stage of framing of charge, the petitioner came across an order of the civil Court about a litigation between Morarilal Sharma and Ramkumar wherein, the Civil Court has held that the property belongs to Ramkumar and this was confirmed by the Revenue Court. Petitioner tries to take the trial Court through that order, but the trial Court has not looked into that order at the stage of framing of charge and it is for that r









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top