SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 751

J.K.MAHESHWARI
Anil Dixit – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
N. K. Tiwari for petitioner; Deepak Awasthy, Government Advocate for respondents No.1, 2 and 3; V. P. Nema for respondent No.7.

ORDER

1. Being aggrieved by the order of transfer, Annexure P-9, dated 28.9.2015 transferring the petitioner from Gram Panchayat Hardi, Janpad Panchayat Deemarkheda, to Gram Panchayat Patera, Janpad Panchayat Rithi, this petition has been filed.

2. The petitioner has relied upon the policy dated 24.7.2014 whereby as per clause 2 the Secretary of the Gram Panchayat can be transferred within the Janpad Panchayat to the nearby Gram Panchayat. However, the order impugned, Annexure P-9, transferring the petitioner from one Janpad Panchayat to another Janpad Panchayat is unsustainable in law.

3. On the other hand, counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.7 has strenuously urged that the activities of the petitioner was not in the interest of Gram Panchayat, therefore, the order impugned has rightly been passed by the Commissioner, after approval of the Minister in terms of clause 8 of the said policy transferring him from one Janpad Panchayat to another Janpad Panchayat, therefore, the order impugned do not warrant any interference.

4. After hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the parties and looking to clause 2 of the policy dated 24.7.2014, suffice it to observe that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top