Back
VANDANA KASREKAR
CMD (EZ) MPPKVVCL – Appellant
Versus
Sharad Oshwal – Respondent
1. The petitioners have filed the present revision challenging the order dated 27.8.2014 passed by 10th Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No.111-A/2011 thereby rejecting an application filed by the petitioners under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent has filed a civil suit against the petitioners for recovery of an amount of Rs.2,89,000/- together with interest at the rate of 28%. The aforesaid amount has been sought to be recovered as interest on the delayed payment to the respondent. The respondent is a Small Scale Industry and in the plaint reliance has been placed on the provisions of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 2006’). The petitioners have filed an application under Order 7 rule 11 of CPC on the ground that the suit, as appeared from the statement of plaint, to be barred under the Act of 2006. It has been submitted that the Act of 2006 is a self-contained Code creating right in favour, inter alia, of Small Scale Industry to recover interest on the delayed payment as well as the forum for recovery of such payment, thus, the respon
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
