JARAT KUMAR JAIN
Piyush – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This criminal revision under section 397 read with section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Code”) has been filed against the order dated 22.9.2015 passed by Fourth ASJ, Ratlam in S.T. No.161/2015, whereby framed the charges against the applicant for offences under sections 376 and 506 of IPC.
2. Brief facts of this case are that on 22.5.2015 prosecutrix has lodged a report stating that before two years an engagement ceremony of applicant and prosecutrix was performed by their parents and before eight months marriage was also solemnized between them in a Temple. After performing such marriage, applicant used to have physical relationship with the prosecutrix on the pretext that he would perform marriage with the prosecutrix as per the Hindu rites and rituals. Before 12 days the parents of the prosecutrix asked the applicant to perform marriage with the prosecutrix as per Hindu rites and rituals, then the applicant denied the same and also threatened the prosecutrix with dire consequences. On this basis, FIR at Crime No.119/2015 for an offences under sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of IPC has been registered at Police Station Sailana, District Ratlam. After co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.