N.K.GUPTA
Vinod Kumar Namdev – Appellant
Versus
Zubed Ahmed – Respondent
1. Heard on leave application.
2. The applicant has preferred an application for grant of leave to appeal against the judgment dated 7.7.2014 passed by JMFC, Katni in RT
No.81/2011, whereby the respondent has been acquitted from the charge of offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
3. Facts of the case in short are that, according to the complainant, he gave a sum of Rs.6 lacs on loan to the respondent. The complainant due to friendship with the respondent gave such an amount, which was collected by him in his life time and the respondent gave post dated cheque of Rs.6 lacs of 30.9.2011. When the cheque was submitted to the concerned bank on 13.10.2011, the same was returned with the intimation that there was no sufficient fund. A notice of demand was sent and thereafter, since no payment was made by the respondent, a criminal complaint was filed.
4. The trial Court after considering the evidence adduced by the applicant, acquitted the respondent.
5. After considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, it appears that in the complaint, the applicant could not state that what was the date of transaction. A post dated cheque may be given fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.