SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 913

N.K.GUPTA
Vinod Kumar Namdev – Appellant
Versus
Zubed Ahmed – Respondent


Advocates:
Siddharth Gulatee for applicant; Shreyas Dubey for respondent.

ORDER

1. Heard on leave application.

2. The applicant has preferred an application for grant of leave to appeal against the judgment dated 7.7.2014 passed by JMFC, Katni in RT

No.81/2011, whereby the respondent has been acquitted from the charge of offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. Facts of the case in short are that, according to the complainant, he gave a sum of Rs.6 lacs on loan to the respondent. The complainant due to friendship with the respondent gave such an amount, which was collected by him in his life time and the respondent gave post dated cheque of Rs.6 lacs of 30.9.2011. When the cheque was submitted to the concerned bank on 13.10.2011, the same was returned with the intimation that there was no sufficient fund. A notice of demand was sent and thereafter, since no payment was made by the respondent, a criminal complaint was filed.

4. The trial Court after considering the evidence adduced by the applicant, acquitted the respondent.

5. After considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, it appears that in the complaint, the applicant could not state that what was the date of transaction. A post dated cheque may be given fo






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top