SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 924

PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
Sangeeta Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A. Choubey for petitioner; R. K. Mangal for respondents.

ORDER

1. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner challenging the order dated 4.7.2015 whereby the petitioner's services as Aaganwadi Worker have been terminated.

2. In brief the case of petitioner is that she was appointed as Aaganwadi Worker at village Kheda Pindoniya vide order dated 28.4.2007 since then she is discharging her duty diligently but abruptly by the impugned order dated 4.7.2015 her services have been terminated.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the impugned order has been passed in violation to the principle of natural justice and without following the procedure which has been prescribed in the applicable circular.

4. Counsel for State has supported the impugned order.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for parties and perused the record.

6. The detailed procedure in respect of appointment and termination has been prescribed in the circular dated 10.7.2007. Clause D of the circular provides the procedure for removing an Aaganwadi Worker and reads as under:-

^^n- vkaxuokM+h dk;ZdrkZ@lgkf;dk dks in ls gVkus dh izfdz;k %&

1- ;fn vkaxuokM+h dk;ZdrkZ@lgkf;dk }kjk vkaxuokM+h dsUnz dk lapkyu fu;ekuqlkj ugha fd;k tkrk gS vFkok muds }kjk vius drZO;ksa ,oa nk










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top